Mediating in a Women-Only Space: A New Approach to Conflict Resolution


Nari Adalat is a groundbreaking initiative in India that places women at the forefront of justice. These specialized courts will serve as an alternative platform for resolving various disputes that predominantly impact women in patriarchal societies, including matters related to domestic violence, property rights, and other gender-related issues. The scheme embraces the principles of participatory democracy. Participatory democracy is a form of governance in which citizens actively engage in the decision-making process and have a direct influence on policies and initiatives that affect their lives. It emphasizes the involvement of the general public in political decision-making, allowing them to play an active role in shaping the direction of their communities and societies.



The scheme leads women from diverse backgrounds to unite, forming a collective voice challenging patriarchal norms and biases within the formal legal system. This model of alternative dispute resolution is characterized by its cost-effectiveness, swiftness, and unwavering sensitivity to the needs and aspirations of women. Beyond dispute resolution, Nari Adalat educates women about their legal rights, enabling them to access government schemes and services. The scheme for women only arbitration will be launched as a pilot project in 50 villages each in Assam and Jammu and Kashmir, beginning in August. Following this initial phase, the plan is to scale it up and extend its coverage to encompass the entire country within the next six months.


What exactly constitutes Women only Courts?


Each Nari Adalat will be composed of 7 to 9 members, with half of the members being elected representatives from the gram panchayat and the other half comprising women with notable social standing, such as teachers, doctors, and social workers. The villagers themselves will nominate these members, ensuring local participation and representation.


The Nari Adalats will be supported by individuals known as Nyaya Sakhis" nominated or selected by the gram panchayat, who will serve as legal counselors and advocates for women and girls seeking assistance from the courts. Nyaya Sakhis are chosen based on their understanding of legal matters and their commitment to women's empowerment. They provide guidance, support, and information to women, ensuring that they are aware of their legal rights and entitlements. Nyaya Sakhis facilitate the resolution of disputes through peaceful means, such as negotiation, mediation, and reconciliation, encouraging mutual consent among the involved parties. By empowering women and serving as advocates for their rights, Nyaya Sakhis play a pivotal role in promoting gender equality and fostering a more inclusive and just society. Every six months, one of the Nyaya Sakhis will be designated as the Mukhya Nyaya Sakhi or the head of the Nari Adalat.


Although the Nari Adalats won't possess legal authority, they will employ various methods such as negotiation, mediation, and reconciliation to resolve cases amicably with the consent of all parties involved. Additionally, the courts may use pressure group tactics to influence the parties and work towards restoring harmony and justice within the community.


This initiative will be integrated into the Sambal sub-scheme of Mission Shakti, a government program aimed at promoting women's safety and security. The Nari Adalats will handle cases impacting women and girls within the community, such as domestic violence, dowry issues, divorce disputes, and property rights matters.The Nari Adalats are poised to play a crucial role in promoting women's rights and access to justice at the local level, fostering a more equitable and supportive environment for women in Indian villages.



Need for this measure


Nari Adalats in India will serve as an alternative to both the formal and informal justice systems, aiming to bridge the gap between them. The conventional formal justice system often proves difficult to access due to its high costs, lengthy procedures, and insensitivity towards women's issues. On the other hand, the informal justice system, represented by entities like khap panchayats or caste councils, tends to be biased, regressive, and steeped in patriarchal norms. Khap panchayats are traditional social institutions in some rural areas of India. They are community councils or caste-based councils that hold considerable influence over the local population, especially in matters related to social norms, customs, and disputes. While they hold no legal authority in the formal judicial system, their strong social influence can sometimes hinder the proper enforcement of law and justice, especially when their decisions contradict the principles of gender equality and individual freedoms upheld by the Indian Constitution. This makes it more and more important to constitute alternative forums like Nari Adalats. 


In this context, Nari Adalats provide a much-needed third option that is more responsive, effective, and progressive for women. They offer a platform to address disputes in a peaceful and amicable manner, effectively reducing violence and conflict within society. By empowering women and challenging patriarchal structures, these specialized courts actively contribute to promoting gender equality and social justice. Additionally, Nari Adalats play a significant role in promoting social change and development. Through their work, they create awareness and sensitization on pertinent issues, fostering a culture of respect and harmony among different groups. By elevating the status of women and ensuring their rights are protected, these courts actively contribute to the overall development of communities and society as a whole. Their efforts lead the way towards a more equitable and inclusive future, where women's voices are heard, and their rights are upheld.



Challenges


The enthusiasm and active participation of women in Nari Adalats, aimed at liberating themselves, are truly commendable. However, they face numerous obstacles imposed by society and authorities, hindering their progress. Initially, it was challenging to convince village women, often illiterate and confined to their homes, to unite and address issues of law and order exclusive to women. Societal biases and discouragement added to their difficulties, making each step an uphill battle.


Despite these challenges, a few women who understood the significance of Nari Adalats started promoting the institution and underwent rigorous paralegal training. However, they faced further constraints, including demands for bribes from authorities and even force when seeking assistance. Moreover, the Adalat itself had some shortcomings that required urgent attention. Delays in trial procedures and inadequacy of jury members have raised concerns. Influential individuals attempting to manipulate ignorant members and instances of betrayal within the Adalat have shaken its credibility.

To address these issues, efficiency must be improved to avoid trial delays, and the frequency of Adalat sessions should be increased. By tackling these challenges head-on, Nari Adalats can continue their important work in empowering women and delivering justice to those who seek it.



Suggestions 


A comprehensive examination of the functioning of Nari Adalats reveals valuable suggestions to enhance their effectiveness and expand their influence:


  • Promoting the institution: To increase awareness and reach a wider audience, Nari Adalats should be promoted more extensively. Utilizing various media channels such as newspapers, television, radio, and distributing pamphlets in rural areas can help create broader visibility for these courts.
  • Rigorous training of paralegals: Improving the efficiency of the court's members requires regular and comprehensive paralegal training sessions. By enhancing their knowledge and skills, these members can contribute more effectively to the functioning of Nari Adalats.
  • Regular meetings: Organizing frequent meetings among the members themselves can facilitate open discussions on the challenges faced in operating the Adalats and finding solutions collaboratively.
  • Proper monitoring: Implementing monitoring mechanisms, particularly during the initial years of establishment, is crucial. Professionals can be recruited to oversee the sessions and ensure the Adalats operate effectively and fairly.
  • Coordination between government and NGOs: Strengthening the coordination between the government and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can yield positive outcomes. The government can collaborate with specific NGOs to further the objectives of Nari Adalats and ensure more comprehensive support.

By implementing these suggestions, Nari Adalats can improve their efficiency, extend their reach, and better serve the women seeking justice and empowerment within their communities.



Conclusion


While commendable enthusiasm and active participation drive the success of Nari Adalats, they face societal and authority-imposed hindrances. Convincing women, often illiterate and confined to their homes, to unite and address issues of law and order remains a challenging task. Additionally, the efficiency of the Adalats themselves requires attention to avoid delays and uphold the sanctity of the institution. To enhance the efficacy of Nari Adalats, a concerted effort is needed. Promoting the institution through various media channels and distributing pamphlets can increase awareness. Rigorous paralegal training for members, regular meetings to address challenges, and proper monitoring during the initial years are essential steps for improvement. Co-ordination between the government and NGOs can provide comprehensive support to the Adalats. By adopting these suggestions, Nari Adalats can become more efficient, reach a wider audience, and continue their crucial work in empowering women and delivering justice. Ultimately, these women-only courts contribute to fostering a more equitable and inclusive society where women's rights are upheld, and their voices are heard and respected.


Views expressed are the author’s own, 

Law Daily neither endorses it nor is responsible for them.


Post a Comment

0 Comments